1) The man in the tracks was pushed into the tracks and the person who took the picture was taking pictures using flash to try and warn the train to make it stop.
2) The photographer said he took the photo the warn the train with flash as he is running towards the man.
3) I think the photographer had good intentions to try and warn but I think there would be so much negativity about the photo that it might've been better if he didn't but it was a in the moment reaction.
4) I think the photographer did the best he could, because it says in the passage he tried running to the man as fast as he could but wasn't fast enough.
5) I don't think they should've posted this as the front page because it was a little controversial that the photographer didn't do anything, so it would've been better, I think, if they maybe said something in the news but not put it front page on the newspaper.
6) I think to stop bad things from happening because if you had enough time to save someone or something and you took a picture thats almost like murder, because you could've saved a living things life but you didn't.
7) It depends whats the situation is and how the photographer is putting himself or herself in the situation.
8) It depends what they are influencing if it is in a positive way then of course they should influence but if its in a negative way I don't think they should influence unless its to help out.
9) The photographer tried their best to help out that person and help the situation so I think the whole thing that happened on the photographers side was ok, and an appropriate response.
No comments:
Post a Comment